Abbanabba
March 7th, 2005, 11:22 PM
I just received a letter from the surgeon I originally saw in 2003, as I had also dropped him a quick letter (with the results from 1997 & 2004) outlining the situation. He has responded with a full page letter explaining in part why the diagnosis of surgery was changed (apparently the MRI showed the right ventricle is still coping sufficienty with the PV regurgitation) and further explaining why they feel trace regurgitation through all my valves is not something to be concerned with at this time, etc (..."As far as the other valves go, trace to mild is not unusual, in fact a trace is fairly common even in patients with so called "normal hearts". These are not significant lesions."..). As far as the escalation of the PV regurgitation, he said it would be hard for him to make any judgement without actually seeing the Echo himself, but thought this was only a minor step up from "mod-severe" (..I guess "severe" is a problem when the right ventricle starts to suffer..(?)..).
He indicated that although the aortic root was enlarging, that they would possibly wait for it to enlarge to 5 to 5.5 cm. He suggested this was another complication in the timing of a PVR, because if the aorta also needs replacing, then it may be prudent to do them at the same time.... which makes sense I guess.
He also acknowledged my frustration at having to wait around until things were deemed bad enough to do anything (..thankyou!!..) but again reiterated that it is very hard to judge when the time is right, although if my symptoms were worsening, then it may well be time. He assured me my current cardio is quite competent and should be able to "guide me appropriately".
So - although that still left quite a few of my questions unanswered, at least it gave me SOME sort of explanation of things. I will still see my cardio in May to get a response to the other things I wanted to know.
Meanwhile, I'll be dropping the surgeon a letter to thank him for taking the time to clarify some of these things.
Cheers
Anna : )
He indicated that although the aortic root was enlarging, that they would possibly wait for it to enlarge to 5 to 5.5 cm. He suggested this was another complication in the timing of a PVR, because if the aorta also needs replacing, then it may be prudent to do them at the same time.... which makes sense I guess.
He also acknowledged my frustration at having to wait around until things were deemed bad enough to do anything (..thankyou!!..) but again reiterated that it is very hard to judge when the time is right, although if my symptoms were worsening, then it may well be time. He assured me my current cardio is quite competent and should be able to "guide me appropriately".
So - although that still left quite a few of my questions unanswered, at least it gave me SOME sort of explanation of things. I will still see my cardio in May to get a response to the other things I wanted to know.
Meanwhile, I'll be dropping the surgeon a letter to thank him for taking the time to clarify some of these things.
Cheers
Anna : )